Join our newsletter

How high-performing software teams thrive in fully distributed environments.
Remote-first ≠ Remote-friendly
Remote work isn't new for software teams. But truly thriving in a remote-first setup—one built for asynchronous workflows, cross-team alignment, and maximum developer productivity—is still a significant challenge.
In fact, according to GitLab’s Remote Work Report 2023, 82% of remote software teams struggle with cross-team visibility and asynchronous alignment. Add timezone differences, varying skill levels, unclear processes, and complexity multiplies.
To tackle these challenges, at Kenility, we adopted a structured remote-first approach, based on strategic skills, smart tools, and intentional processes. Here's exactly how—and why—it works.
Many teams describe themselves as remote, but how deeply integrated is the remote mindset within their processes?
Aspect | Remote-light | Remote-first (Kenility’s approach) |
Documentation | Partial, reactive, informal | Structured, proactive, and scalable |
Decision-Making | Synchronous-heavy, high latency | Explicitly asynchronous, distributed authority |
AI Integration | Experimental or isolated | Systemic, deeply integrated into workflows |
Culture & Recognition | Spontaneous, dependent on managers | Intentional, integrated, scalable |
Delivery & Productivity | Depends heavily on availability | Designed for autonomy and async performance |
Understanding this difference is critical. Remote-first teams don’t just replicate an office remotely—they redesign how they collaborate entirely.
At Kenility, asynchronous communication is not optional—it's foundational. A remote-first team doesn't operate effectively without individuals who possess structured asynchronous thinking skills.
As Buffer’s State of Remote Work 2023 highlights, teams with strong async practices see increased productivity and reduced burnout—two critical benefits in fast-paced software environments.
Most dev teams are experimenting with AI, but few have truly integrated it. At Kenility, we see AI tools as productivity amplifiers—not nice-to-haves.
According to Stack Overflow’s Developer Survey, developers increasingly see AI tools not as threats, but as essential productivity enhancers, when properly integrated.
Real remote-first culture isn't built around spontaneous interactions alone—it’s intentionally designed. At Kenility, culture is structured and explicitly integrated into everyday workflows.
According to Harvard Business Review (Creating a Culture of Recognition), recognition boosts team engagement by 4.6x. In remote teams, where visibility is lower, the impact is even greater.
Stack Overflow’s developer surveys consistently highlight frustrations like unclear communication, insufficient documentation, and poorly managed expectations.
Top frustrations (Stack Overflow) | How Kenility’s remote-first pillars address it |
Poor cross-team communication (66%) | Structured async communication & tools |
Insufficient documentation & unclear scope (59%) | Intentional documentation and AI integration |
Misalignment & inefficient meetings (55%) | Async-first decision-making and clear culture norms |
By directly addressing these pain points through our structured approach, we've significantly improved developer satisfaction, reduced churn, and increased velocity.
High-performing distributed teams aren’t lucky—they’re intentional. It’s not about having Slack or Zoom; it’s about how clearly and effectively teams think, document, and collaborate when physical proximity isn’t an option.
If you want to scale productivity and quality in remote-first teams, look beyond the tools.
Focus on the thinking, structure, and culture that empower your team to perform at its highest level—no matter the time zone.
Reach out to see how we do it at Kenility.
📩 hello@kenility.com
🌐 kenility.com
References & further reading: